We discuss movie thrillers based on real-life events.

May 25th, 2008

movie ritual

May 19, 2008 - Thrilling movies are fun to watch, especially with the comfort of knowing they’re works of fiction. But when something is based on events that have occurred off-screen, in the real world, suddenly it becomes even scarier. Inspired by true events, The Strangers – starring Liv Tyler and Scott Speedman – is a terrifying suspense thriller about a couple whose remote getaway becomes a place of terror when masked strangers invade. To coincide with its upcoming release, we highlight some other films based on all too true events.
Originally a best-selling novel, the story of The Exorcist finds its origins in the demonic possession of a little boy in Cottage Town, Maryland. While many of the elements were embellished in the translation to film, the core of the story – that a young child was freed of demonic possession by a Catholic priest through the ancient ritual of exorcism – was a real event. It wasn’t until the story was detailed in newspapers nationwide that William Blatty was inspired to write a fictionalized account of the story.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Coming out shortly after The Exorcist, Texas Chainsaw Massacre quickly took the title of “most terrifying movie ever”. But was it as grounded in supposed fact as The Exorcist was? Surely a chainsaw-wielding psychopath didn’t actually hunt down and cannibalize a group of youth in Texas. In reality, the story was made up, but it and the character Leatherface, were both based on the real cannibalistic farmer Ed Gein, who robbed graves, engaged in necrophilia, and killed two women in the 1950s. A chainsaw, however, was never involved in his crimes.
Though the film never claimed to be based on real-events, Alfred Hitchcock’s classic thriller Psycho does indeed borrow real-life elements. In particular, the main villain Norman Bates is based on the same killer, Ed Gein, who was also the inspiration for Leatherface in Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The similarities, however, are subtle: both men bore feminine features and an unnatural attachment to their mothers.

movies.ign.com


Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 25th, 2008 at 8:33 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 Responses to “We discuss movie thrillers based on real-life events.”

  1. Pamela Says:

    It’s a conspiiiiiiiracy!

  2. Kelvin Says:

    Parochial politics. Who gives a shit about your stupid country, far from the centres of civilization.

  3. Korey Says:

    What? Oh. Er… I do…

  4. Carolina Says:

    There is an obvious explanation: Anyone can buy tickets since it is a fund raiser for the Iowa Republican Party, but this year officials were careful only to let people with Iowa IDs vote:From the 8th paragraph of an article:”Straw-poll ticket holders must show a valid Iowa driver’s license to prove their state residence and be handed a ballot.”Whole article here:http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/OPINION01/708090364

  5. Jere Says:

    Diebold voting machinesVoting machine malfunctions (like a slot machine, the guy had to come and turn the screw in the back)Results grossly different than last debate pollhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Decision2008/popup?id=3436820&POLL299=1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000if that one is blank, use the screenshot (it was at about noon time, before President Paul got 34,000 votes)http://bayimg.com/JAFNiAABjalso the drudgereport poll taken about the same timehttp://bayimg.com/LAfkMAAbIspeaking of which, the last poll was fooled with by ABC (they subtracted votes from President Paul to claim romney won, Ron got the votes back quick enough)there were 12,000 tickets bought for people who didn’t vote. I’m supposed to believe that somebody spent $420,000 on tickets which sit in some warehouse to this day? or perhaps 12,000 people wanted to spend $35 to go and not vote.any one of these things alone would not mean anything, but together, it’s hard to refute vote fraud.if there was vote fraud, the solution is video exit polls, not only can the vidiographer easily poll the people without ballets, but they can count the people who don’t want to be exit polled, and the tape is good evidence. If 26,000 people walk into the booth, 26,000 people walk out of the booth, and 14,000 are counted to have voted, something is wrong.

  6. Carola Says:

    This is not a big mystery. The various campaigns buy huge blocks of tickets so they can give them to supporters who might show up.