Pakistan On Tightrope
May 6th, 2008
Pakistan On Tightrope
Prof. Isaac Kfir - 4/13/2008
This article examines Pakistan following the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the recent parliamentary elections within the confines of the challenges that arise from the need to embrace democracy. The article accepts that Pakistan must contend with a powerful military, rising Islamism, tribalism, an unstable political system, quarrelling leaders, and difficult foreign policy issues while it strives to continue to play its role in the global war on terror. The author concludes that only by uniting the different actors and seeking a stable Pakistan can the Islamist threat be defeated.
For over 60 years Pakistan has hovered on the cusp of two worlds: the Islamist and the liberal democratic. Pakistan’s flirtation with Islamist rule began with the decision to vest sovereignty in the hands of Allah in the early 1950s. Over time, the country officially sanctioned Islamist movements such as Jama’at-i-Islami or Tablighi Jama’at and accepted Islamist education and the legal status of Shari’a within Pakistani society. Conversely, Pakistan has also sought to embrace such liberal democratic principles as free elections, separation of power, and multiparty politics, as well as reducing the influence of Islamic law in Pakistan.[1] However, this balance is facing tremendous pressure, with powerful forces demanding that the country decide between the two paths. Most worryingly, the military, the most powerful institution in Pakistan, seems to have its feet in both worlds, trying to maintain a balance between them.[2] President Pervez Musharraf, a former head of the army, highlights this challenge, as he has sought to reform Islamic legislation (the Hudud Ordinance)[3] while also allowing Islamist education and conservative (including militant) Muslims to remain powerful in Pakistan.[4] Musharraf has attempted to reconcile these two demands through “Enlightened Moderation,”[5] which has yet to prove itself fully as a viable option for Pakistan since it does not seem to offer one concrete solution for the different actors operating in the country.
Tags: 3, history, ib, paper
May 6th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Why don’t you post the article here. No one wants to link to a Pakistan server.
May 6th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
no warmongering here.
May 6th, 2008 at 10:48 pm
Load of absolute shite.
May 6th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
The whole country?
May 7th, 2008 at 12:29 am
“Oh we must have overlooked hose two gaping holes in her neck because we only looked at the back of her head before we made a worldwide announcement.”Note to self, if in pakistan get shot in the front and back so death confirmation makes it easier for the examiners.