Netlets for Sunday, March 30

March 30th, 2008

30 march

The March 22 article "Minneapolis schools with low scores will get overhauls" describes a butt-kicking, back-handed approach to school reform.
Washburn and Edison high schools will let go the entire teaching staff, due to the schools’ low test scores on state-mandated tests. They will then rehire the "good" teachers, while the rest are left to flounder in the system, presumably to land a spot in another school where they will, at least in many cases, bump out another teacher. Sort of like musical chairs without the music or happy, party atmosphere.
That test scores are the sole factor propelling this drastic mass exodus is absurd. Test scores alone will never define the rare combination of inspiration, talent, intelligence, patience and stamina that make truly great teachers succeed. Furthermore, exiling the good teachers along with the bad is preposterous. I happen to know the principal of Washburn — she is judicious and sensitive. But her job now must be to hire back the best and brightest, while shoring up morale among a group of "survivors" whose long-time colleagues have been booted off the island.
Private and charter schools are able to mold their own teaching talent; their principals have free rein to hire exceptional teachers and to fire teachers who do not live up to expectations. Minneapolis would do well to play some catch-up, and devise ways to develop their faculty in a humane and effective manner. I would suggest that they begin by pretending "No child Left Behind" was just the empty rhetoric that it is, and enact changes that are truly visionary, not a last-ditch effort that leaves no teacher his pride.
Katherine Kersten’s March 23 column reminded me of Vice President Dick Cheney’s recent response when he was reminded that a majority of Americans don’t think the war in Iraq has been worth the costs.

startribune.com


Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 30th, 2008 at 11:19 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

13 Responses to “Netlets for Sunday, March 30”

  1. Chloe Says:

    More Obama-spam… Buried…

  2. Ruth Says:

    http://moeursalen.blogspot.com/2008/03/pa-senator-

  3. Gwendolen Says:

    woot!

  4. Cora Says:

    Ah, yes… Obama dick sucking at its finest! Keep on slurpin ‘fellas! You sound like a bunch of cheerleaders, this is worse than anything Nintendo-related.

  5. Pip Says:

    “Its embarrassing that given the large (freaking gigantic) disparity in the performance and quality of the two candidates, that 42% still think that Hillary is the better candidate. Exactly how deep in the sand do their heads have to be buried to believe it?”Ahem!I would say skin deep.

  6. Caedmon Says:

    Everybody needs to be cool and let the primaries run their (insanely drawn out) course. Clinton is starting to self-destruct, and, even as the democratic primaries are strengthening Obama, McCain is fading into the woodwork. It’s all about Obama.

  7. Tayla Says:

    Would it be unfair for me to forward the theory that the only reason she’s still in the race is because a lot of women are voting for her not because of the issues, but because they just really like the idea of a female president?And this is coming from a woman.

  8. Peta Says:

    Hillary (waking up at 3am ):”Quick ! Someone bring back Rev. Wright… I’m down hopelessly in the polls”

  9. Keighley Says:

    That BS people. Before the race started Hilary was up more than 10 points on Obama.Polls mean jack people… if you don’t know that already your hopeless. Until October or such the polls are a wavering measure of propaganda effectiveness, but absolutely nothing of value.If anything the polls distort peoples views by giving false representations of public will.

  10. Maree Says:

    Update at 4:20 p.m. ET: Rasmussen Reports, which is tracking the Democratic race in polls that cover four nights as opposed to Gallup’s three, today has the race at Obama 47%, Clinton 42%:

  11. Sharleen Says:

    It does Obama no good to beat Clinton if McCain beats them both. And he’s in the lead.

  12. Evalyn Says:

    I can’t believe that 42% of people still support Clinton after all she has said and done in the past two months let alone the past couple years. She publicly stated in great detail numerous times that she was under sniper fire and when that video is dug up out of the archives she attributed it to “sleep deprivation?” I mean come on.