23-unit site plan dropped

March 15th, 2008

acres home methodist retirement wesley

NORTHAMPTON - A major retirement community developer has dropped plans to build 23 independent-living units off Rocky Hill Road.
Deaconess Abundant Life Communities notified the city’s Planning Department recently that it is not going forward on the project, which would have been built on Christ United Methodist Church property. The Planning Board allowed the organization to withdraw its application without prejudice last week.
According to Bruce W. Young, a land use and conservation planner, Deaconess came upon a major hurdle when the Conservation Commission discovered wetlands on the property that had not been previously noted by a contractor surveying the land.
By city ordinance, developers may not build closer than 50 feet to a wetland in that part of the city. The discovery would have precluded four or five of the independent-living units planned for the site.
The Rev. Herb B. Taylor, the president and chief executive officer of Deaconess Abundant Life Communities, said yesterday that the wetlands oversight - combined with the soft housing market - convinced the organization to reconsider.
“It didn’t become economically feasible to put the project forward,” he said. “Even in any market it would have been tough.”
Deaconess had planned to lease about 40 acres from Christ United Methodist Church, and rent some church space for meetings and coordinate services. Taylor said that services for the residents would have been connected with those at the Rockridge Retirement Community on North King Street, which Deaconess also owns.

read_more


Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 15th, 2008 at 7:39 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

11 Responses to “23-unit site plan dropped”

  1. Alvin Says:

    I’m on a college campus as well, but the site seems to load properly.

  2. Abby Says:

    Fine. Then likewise, when we see a video of a cop beating someone, tasering them to death, or countless other ‘bad’ things, we shouldn’t complain about those either?

  3. Sue Says:

    Bad people will pretend to be good in front of an audience.Good people have no incentive to do the opposite.

  4. Gloria Says:

    I think the users of ratemycop.com will be able to figure this out for themselves. Moreover, you’re going to have cops like that one who went off on the skateboarders who rack up thousands of negative moderations, do you seriously suggest we restrain ourselves similarly in that case?

  5. Ishmael Says:

    On the other hand, these outliers are not normally caused by excessive observation of one instance of the data’s source.

  6. Biddy Says:

    how would they know if you answered dishonestly?

  7. Kenrick Says:

    Same here (using mobile broadband connection though)

  8. Marnie Says:

    doublegood goodpress

  9. Nevada Says:

    This guy was just doing his job. It’s a sad state of affairs when people are lauded for not acting like an ass.Our standards have really, really lowered.

  10. Jewell Says:

    “If the ratings are based on some internet mob mentality rather than the people directly involved with the cop, the site becomes useless”And you’re posting this on reddit.